Connect with us

Economy

Now That WTO Has Accepted Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala’s Nomination

Published

on

From ADEDAPO DAVID ADAMOLEKUN, Geneva

On June 9, 2020, the WTO communicated on its website that ‘Nigeria, on 9 June 2020, nominated Dr Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala for the post of WTO Director-General to succeed the current Director-General, Mr Roberto Azevêdo, who has announced he will step down on 31 August 2020.’

The WTO’s acceptance and announcement of Nigeria’s Okonjo-Iweala came in the face of days of frenzied media speculations following the initial communication by President Muhammad Buhari on June 4, 2020 of the Government’s choice nominee. Concerns were raised that Nigeria might have lost her slot for nominating a candidate given the closure on 30 November, 2019 of the window set by the African Union.

Before pundits will restart another media spar on the correctness or otherwise of the WTO’s acceptance of Dr Okonjo-Iweala candidacy, let’s see what the WTO Procedures say regarding the nomination process.
WTO Procedures

In a letter by David Walker, Chairman of the WTO General Council, dated 20 May, 2020 and available on the Organisation’s website, on the ‘Appointment of the Next Director-General: Communication from Chairman of the General Council to Members’, he shared some of the milestones for the appointment process as set out in the WTO Procedures.

Furthermore, Mr Walker clarified key administrative details relating to the nominations and provision of supporting information, viz:
“The appointment process will start on Monday 8 June 2020. In line with the Procedures, Members shall have one month after the start of the appointment process to nominate candidates. i.e. from 8 June to 8 July 2020. All nominations and supporting information must be addressed to me, as Chairman of the General Council, and must be received by 8 July 2020 at cob in Geneva. In line with the Procedures, the nominations and supporting information will be distributed to Members as they are received. Nominations and supporting information should be addressed to: Chairman of the General Council World Trade Organization – WTO 154 Rue de Lausanne 1211 Geneva 2 Switzerland.”

It is imperative to understand that nowhere in the Procedures was it required that WTO member countries needed to first go through any regional bloc to submit nominations; or seek the endorsement of individual member countries to put out candidates for the position of the Organisation’s Director-General. It then beggars the question why it became an issue that Nigeria had risked the displeasure of some countries by an ostensible tardy submission of Dr Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala’s nomination on 4 June, or even 9 June 2020 when same was received and accepted by the WTO.
Clearly, President Muhammadu Buhari acted in full compliance of the WTO Procedures in submitting Dr Okonjo-Iweala’s nomination; and well ahead of the schedule too, since the deadline is still four weeks away, 8 July 2020 precisely. But all that speculations are behind us for good now.

What should now be of primary interest to Nigeria and her friends is how to seize the moment and leverage on the golden opportunity to ensure the election of the first African, first woman, the region’s finest, and the globally acclaimed Dr Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala as WTO next Director-General.

Why Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala?

Two developments in the past 12 months will be of seismic importance for the next generations of the African continent: the realisation of the need to proactively manage catastrophes such as the COVID-19 pandemic and natural disasters and the start of the African Continental Free Trade Agreement (ACFTA). In terms of the former, the world has strongly put its weight behind one of Africa’s egalitarian daughters, Dr Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala. Through her leadership of the GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance, world leaders have pledged an additional US$ 8.8 billion far exceeding the target of US$ 7.4 billion. These significant sums will see over 300 million children immunised over the next five years, including the creation and distribution of the COVID vaccine; the largest investment in immunisation ever made by lower-income countries mostly in Africa.

The success at GAVI sets the stage for the next challenge, ACFTA, the most ambitious trade zone project in the world. The brilliance of the African Union Heads of States requires a collective ambition matched with global clout and outstanding diplomatic skills. No other region has tried to weld 54 countries into a single market and eventually a full customs union. It also flies in the face of the waves of nationalism, protectionism and populism surging around the world. The execution of which requires the experience for such negotiations can be gleaned from Dr Okonjo-Iweala’s successful debt cancellation of 60% of Nigeria’s external debt ($18 billion) with the Paris Club. The debt deal also included an innovative buy-back mechanism that wiped out Nigeria’s Paris Club debt and reduced the country’s external indebtedness from $35 billion to $5 billion. More on this below.

At the beginning of the year, while the United Kingdom was finally divorcing itself from the European Union, a group of almost twenty African heads of states were invited to London. The purpose of the visit was to cement the trading relationship between the two continents. Similar advancements have been made by the French, Chinese and Russians to name but a few. The battle for the hearts and minds of the continent is heating up. This highlights the fact that the global trade conversation has moved from the periphery for the continent. In that regard, a steady and recognisable hand is required to steer the global dialogue.

Brains and Mettle

The rationale for her candidacy is transparent. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala is a global finance expert, an economist and international development professional with over 30 years of experience working in Asia, Africa, Europe, Latin America and North America. She is Chair of the Board of Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. Since its creation in 2000, Gavi has immunized 760 million children globally and saved thirteen million lives. She sits on the Boards of Standard Chartered PLC and Twitter Inc.

She was recently appointed as African Union (AU) Special Envoy to mobilise International financial support for the fight against COVID-19 and WHO Special Envoy for Access to COVID-19 Tools Accelerator. She is a skilled negotiator and has brokered numerous agreements which have produced win-win outcomes in negotiations. She is regarded as an effective consensus builder and an honest broker enjoying the trust and confidence of governments and other stakeholders.

Previously, Dr. Okonjo-Iweala twice served as Nigeria’s Finance Minister (2003-2006 and 2011-2015) and briefly acted as Foreign Minister in 2006, the first woman to hold both positions. She distinguished herself by carrying out major reforms which improved the effectiveness of these two Ministries and the functioning of the government machinery. She had a 25-year career at the World Bank as a development economist, rising to the No. 2 position of Managing Director, Operations. As a development economist and Finance Minister, Dr Okonjo-Iweala steered her country through various reforms ranging from macroeconomic to trade, financial and real sector issues.

Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala is a firm believer in the power of trade to lift developing countries out of poverty and assist them to achieve robust economic growth and sustainable development. As Finance Minister, she was involved in trade negotiations with other West African countries and contributed to the overhaul of Nigeria’s trade policy enabling it to enhance its competitiveness. She has closely followed developments at the WTO, as she believes that a strengthened multilateral trading system is in the interests of all countries, particularly least developed and African countries.

As Managing Director of the World Bank, she had oversight responsibility for the World Bank’s $81 billion operational portfolio in Africa, South Asia, Europe and Central Asia. Dr Okonjo-Iweala spearheaded several World Bank initiatives to assist low-income countries during the 2008-2009 food crisis and later during the financial crisis. In 2010, she was Chair of the World Bank’s successful drive to raise $49.3 billion in grants and low interest credit for the poorest countries in the world.

As Minister of Finance in Nigeria, she spearheaded negotiations with the Paris Club of Creditors that led to the wiping out of $30 billion of Nigeria’s debt, including the outright cancellation of $18 billion. In her second term as Finance Minister, Dr Okonjo-Iweala was responsible for leading reform that enhanced transparency of government accounts and strengthened institutions against corruption, including the implementation of the GIFMS (Government Integrated Financial Management System), the IPPMS (Integrated Personnel and Payroll Management System), and the TSA (Treasury Single Accounts).

Additionally, Dr Okonjo-Iweala is currently Chair of the Board of the African Union’s African Risk Capacity (ARC), an innovative weather-based insurance mechanism for African countries; and co-Chair of the Global Commission on the Economy and Climate with Lord Nicholas Stern and Mr Paul Polman. She is also Chair of the Board of the Nelson Mandela Institution, an umbrella body for the African Institutes of Science and Technology, and Chair of the Board of the African University of Science and Technology, Abuja. Dr Okonjo-Iweala is a trustee of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

She presently serves on the following advisory boards or groups – the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, Harvard University International Advisory Board, the Oxford University Martin School Advisory Council, Mercy Corps International Advisory Board, Women’s World Banking Africa Advisory Board, the International Commission on Financing Global Education (Chaired by Gordon Brown), Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Advisory Board, Tsinghua University Beijing – School of Public Policy and Management Global Advisory Board, the CARICOM (Caribbean) Commission on the Economy, the Bloomberg Task Force on Fiscal Policy for Health, and Tax Inspectors Without Borders of the OECD among others. The list continues.

A Sling Shot Needed

Considering the eminent qualification and robust of mettle of Nigeria’s nominee for the WTO top job, it is evident that the noble objective of the African Union to create a single continental market, through ACFTA, for goods and services, with free movement of business persons and investments will receive a great boost with a purpose-driven leadership at the World Trade Organisation, such as Ngozi Okonj0-Iweala can provide.

Also, there have been calls for the WTO to update its rules and commitment to make them fit with the modern 21st century economy; substantially dependent on services, digitization and cross-border flows that are different from the goods-trade flows that currently define the institution. The argument is that since the Uruguay Round in 1994, which came into effect in 1995 bringing in trade in services and intellectual property for the first time, the WTO hasn’t produced any big achievements and may be progressively losing its attractiveness.

Therefore, as the world aims to ‘build back better’ in the era following COVID-19, the WTO needs a savvy bridge builder, bold reformer and an astute global citizen who will bring much needed acumen for a predictable, transparent, non-discriminatory and open global trading system which is essential for broad-based, sustainable economic recovery. It makes sense that Africa strongly rallies behind Nigeria and join forces with the global community in electing Dr Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala as the next Director Director-General of the World Trade Organisation.

-Adedapo David Adamolekun,
Writes from Geneva, Switzerland

Continue Reading

Business

Why PENGASSAN and NUPENG Must Halt Their Fight with Dangote Refinery: A National Interest Imperative

Published

on

By

By James Aduku Odaudu

Introduction

Labour unions are vital in protecting workers’ rights, ensuring fair wages, and safeguarding welfare. In Nigeria’s oil and gas sector, the Petroleum and Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria (PENGASSAN) and the Nigeria Union of Petroleum and Natural Gas Workers (NUPENG) have historically played strong roles in defending their members.
However, their ongoing conflict with the Dangote Refinery risks undermining not only a private enterprise but also Nigeria’s broader national economic interests. This is a fight that must be urgently de-escalated.

• The Dangote Refinery as a National Asset

The $20 billion Dangote Refinery is not just a private venture—it is a strategic national asset. As the largest single-train refinery in the world, it has the capacity to meet Nigeria’s domestic demand for refined petroleum products and even export surplus to other African markets. For decades, Nigeria has depended on fuel imports despite being Africa’s top crude oil producer. The refinery offers a pathway out of this paradox.

Any disruption to its operations will have ripple effects: from fuel scarcity and increased transportation costs to inflationary pressures that affect every Nigerian household. The stakes are simply too high to allow union battles to derail such a transformative project.

• Labour Rights vs. Public Interest

The right of workers to unionize, negotiate, and advocate for improved welfare is fundamental. But in industrial relations, there is always a balancing act between labour rights and the public interest. When union actions threaten to destabilize a facility as strategic as the Dangote Refinery, the collective well-being of over 200 million Nigerians must come first.

By escalating their fight with the refinery, PENGASSAN and NUPENG risk:

i. Jeopardizing thousands of direct and indirect jobs created by the refinery.

ii. Triggering possible layoffs if operations are stalled.
iii. Undermining the long-term sustainability of the refinery, which would ironically harm the very workers they represent.

• Safeguarding Investor Confidence

The Dangote Refinery is a flagship project that has drawn global attention. If labour unions cripple its operations, it sends a dangerous signal to both domestic and foreign investors—that Nigeria is an unstable and hostile environment for large-scale industrial projects. This perception could deter future investments in infrastructure, energy, and manufacturing, sectors Nigeria urgently needs to diversify its economy.

Investor confidence is fragile, and policy inconsistency, regulatory uncertainties, and industrial unrest are among the top deterrents. A protracted conflict with the refinery would erode confidence, stall expansion, and hurt Nigeria’s international credibility.

• The Public Interest Dimension
Nigeria is already grappling with the aftermath of subsidy removal, unstable electricity supply, and rising transportation costs. Any further disruption in petroleum product supply will inflict additional hardship on citizens. Fuel scarcity, price hikes, and inflation will erode disposable incomes and deepen poverty levels.

The unions must recognize that this battle is not only between them and Dangote but between narrow industrial interests and the collective survival of Nigerians. The national interest must prevail.

• The Way Forward: Constructive Engagement

Stopping the conflict does not mean silencing the unions. Rather, it requires adopting more constructive mechanisms for dispute resolution. Several pathways exist:

i. Tripartite Dialogue: The Federal Ministry of Labour and Employment can convene a tripartite forum involving the unions, Dangote management, and government regulators to mediate disputes.

ii. Arbitration and Mediation: Independent arbitration panels can resolve disagreements on union recognition, welfare packages, or safety concerns without recourse to strikes.

iii. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Negotiations: Instead of confrontation, unions can push for CSR projects, community benefits, and long-term staff development commitments.

iv. Phased Union Integration: If recognition is at the heart of the dispute, a gradual integration process could be negotiated to avoid sudden disruption.

• Conclusion
The fight between PENGASSAN, NUPENG, and the Dangote Refinery is not a private matter; it is a national issue with far-reaching implications. While the unions have legitimate concerns, their methods must not endanger Nigeria’s economic stability, job security, and energy independence.

A refinery that promises to save Nigeria billions in foreign exchange, stabilize fuel supply, and attract global investors should be protected, not sabotaged. For the sake of workers, investors, and citizens, this fight must stop—and constructive engagement must begin.

 Dr James Aduku Odaudu is a development administrator, communication consultant and the CEO of Sunrise Media Limited. He can be reached at jamesaduku@gmail.com

Continue Reading

Business

CHINESE COMPANY, HUAXIN BUYS $1BN STAKE IN LAFARGE

Published

on

By

Swiss cement maker Holcim will exit its Nigerian business through the sale of its nearly 84 per cent stake in Lafarge Africa to China’s Huaxin Cement, the firm announced in a statement on Sunday.

The sale price was $1bn for a 100 per cent stake.

It stated, “The sale aligns with Holcim’s strategy to streamline its portfolio and focus on high-growth regions, including the upcoming spin-off of its North American business, which remains on track for a US listing in the first half of 2025.

“The transaction is expected to close in 2025, subject to regulatory approval, according to Holcim’s statement, which did not provide further details on the reason for this specific sale.”

Huaxin Cement is a major player in Nigeria’s cement market following its acquisition of a controlling stake in Lafarge Africa, which was finalized in August 2025. This deal gave the Chinese company control of four cement plants with a combined production capacity of over 10 million tonnes per year.
Acquisition of Lafarge Africa
The deal: Huaxin Cement acquired the 83.81% shareholding of Lafarge Africa from the Swiss building materials giant Holcim.

Transaction value: The acquisition was valued at $1 billion on a 100% equity basis before dividend adjustments. However, adjustments due to dividends paid to Holcim between January 2024 and August 2025 revised the final transaction consideration to $773 million.

Strategic move: The acquisition provides Huaxin with a strong foothold in Nigeria, Africa’s largest economy and most populous country. The company views Nigeria as a key strategic pivot for its expansion into West Africa.
Assets and market position
Following the acquisition, Huaxin gained control of Lafarge Africa’s four large-scale cement plants, which have a combined annual production capacity of 10.6 million tons

Ewekoro and Sagamu: Located in the South-West region.

Mfamosing: Located in the South-South.

Ashaka: Located in the North-East.

The acquisition makes Huaxin Cement a formidable competitor to existing market leaders like Dangote Cement and BUA Cement.

Legal and market controversies
The takeover was met with some controversy in Nigeria:
Minority shareholder lawsuit: A Nigerian minority shareholder, Strategic Consultancy, has challenged the deal in court, alleging secrecy and claiming that local investors were not given the right of first refusal.

Share price discrepancy: The mandatory takeover offer (MTO) for the remaining shares was set at a lower price than Lafarge Africa’s trading price at the time, leaving it uncertain how minority shareholders would respond.

Parliamentary scrutiny: In March 2025, the Nigerian Senate debated the sale, with some lawmakers calling for government oversight to protect shareholder rights and ensure transparency.

Outlook
Despite the legal challenges, Huaxin is set to become a dominant force in the Nigerian cement market. The company has a history of acquiring assets from Holcim across Africa to fuel its global expansion and is now implementing its strategy in Nigeria. In September 2025, Huaxin announced it is considering restructuring its overseas assets to support further expansion and operational flexibility.

Continue Reading

Economy

I Resigned as CEO of NNPCL, Not Sacked — Bayo Ojulari

Published

on

By

The former Chief Executive Officer of the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL), Mr. Bayo Ojulari, has opened up on the circumstances surrounding his resignation, citing internal resistance to reforms and entrenched interests as key reasons for his decision to step down.

Ojulari, who was appointed to lead NNPCL following the implementation of the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA), said his vision for transforming the national oil company into a commercially viable and transparent institution was consistently undermined by vested interests.

According to him, “I accepted the role with the utmost belief in President Bola Tinubu’s vision for reforming Nigeria’s oil and gas sector. However, over time, it became clear that there were internal forces resistant to change. These interests placed personal gains above national progress, making it impossible to move the reforms forward.”

While his resignation surprised many within and outside the industry, Ojulari noted that he left with a clear conscience, having initiated critical internal audits, streamlined procurement processes, and pushed for transparency in operations.

He emphasized that he was not forced out, contrary to some media reports. “I wasn’t sacked. I resigned because I no longer had the freedom and institutional backing to drive the changes that were necessary. It would have been a betrayal of my own values to stay on and become part of a system I sought to reform,” he said.

During his tenure, Ojulari was credited with driving cost-efficiency initiatives, reviewing legacy contracts, and initiating the clean-up of NNPCL’s joint venture operations. However, these actions reportedly ruffled powerful feathers, both within and outside the corporation.

Industry stakeholders have expressed mixed reactions to his exit. Some commended him for taking a principled stand, while others questioned the timing of his resignation amid ongoing fuel subsidy and crude oil production challenges.

As speculations continue about his next move, Ojulari remains optimistic about Nigeria’s oil sector. “We have the capacity, the talent, and the resources. What we need is the will—political and institutional—to do what is right.”

The Federal Government is yet to announce his replacement. However, insiders say a shortlist of potential successors is already under review by the presidency.

Ojulari’s departure marks another shake-up in President Tinubu’s oil sector reforms, which have seen key leadership changes in the NNPCL since 2023

Continue Reading

Archives

Categories

Meta

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending